Adkins v. Beck et al
Emily Adkins |
Officer Evan Beck and Officer Clayton Bechtold |
3:2020cv00821 |
October 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Henry E Hudson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER that Defendants' #3 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 12/7/2020. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 12/7/2020. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 4 Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Clayton Bechtold, Evan Beck. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9)(Seyfarth, Julie) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Clayton Bechtold, Evan Beck. (Seyfarth, Julie) |
Filing 2 Letter re local counsel requirement mailed to Plaintiff's attorney with copy of Local Rule 83.1. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7459063.), filed by Evan Beck, Clayton Bechtold. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seyfarth, Julie) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/22/2020) (jsmi, ). |
Case assigned to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (jsmi, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.