Scalia v. Southern Brick Contractors, Inc. et al
Eugene Scalia |
Southern Brick Contractors, Inc., Southern Brick Contractors, Inc. 401(k) Plan and Estate of Stephen H. Catlett |
3:2020cv00875 |
November 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
M Hannah Lauck |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CONSENT JUDGMENT - This Court retains jurisdiction over this action for purposes of enforcing compliance with the terms of this Consent Judgment. The Court directs the entry of this Consent Judgment as a final order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 11/20/2020. (smej, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Ryan M. Kooi to appear as Pro hac vice for Eugene Scalia. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 11/17/2020. (smej, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment by Eugene Scalia. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Judgment)(France, Angela) |
Filing 2 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Ryan M. Kooi and Certification of Local Counsel Angela H. France by Eugene Scalia. (France, Angela) |
Filing 1 Complaint , filed by Eugene Scalia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (France, Angela) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.