Beville v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Christopher W. Beville |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and USAA Federal Savings Bank |
| 3:2021cv00343 |
| May 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Leonard Anthony Bennett on behalf of Christopher W. Beville (Bennett, Leonard) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Craig Carley Marchiando on behalf of Christopher W. Beville (Marchiando, Craig) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC, USAA Federal Savings Bank. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (jpow, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Christopher W. Beville. (Pittman, Dale) |
| Filing 1 Complaint and demand for jury trial ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-7814875.), filed by Christopher W. Beville. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pittman, Dale) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (jpow, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
