Mooney v. Clarke
| Lee Alden Mooney |
| Harold Clarke |
| 3:2021cv00579 |
| September 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth W Hanes |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Harold Clarke. (Huffstutter, Timothy)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Joseph Huffstutter on behalf of Harold Clarke (Huffstutter, Timothy)
|
|
Filing 7
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF Receipt as to #6 Order of Prisoner Service (2254),,, filed by Harold Clarke. (Huffstutter, Timothy)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Serving 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition) - That petition is FILED; Respondent to file responsive pleading within thirty (30) days of receipt of this memorandum order; Respondent to treat this memorandum order as a request the state criminal trial and habeas corpus records, if pertinent and available, be forwarded to the Clerks Office in Richmond, VA; Clerk directed to serve Respondent(s) by electronically transmitting a copy of this memorandum order and the petition to the AG of VA. See Order for more details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 10/15/2021. Copy of memorandum order mailed to petitioner as directed. Copy of memorandum order and the petition electronically transmitted to AG of VA as directed. (jpow, )
|
|
Filing 5
Letter received from Lee A. Mooney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jpow, )
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Lee Alden Mooney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jpow, )
|
|
Filing 3
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Filing Fee Paid: $ 5.00, receipt number 34683051517 (money order held in court safe until Petition received) (Attachments: #1 Letter from Lee A Mooney). (lbre, )
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Conditionally Filing 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition) - That petition is CONDITIONALLY FILED; Clerk directed to process Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; if not previously submitted, failure of Petitioner to return completed in forma pauperis affidavit within fifteen (15) days will result in dismissal of action. See Order for more details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 9/15/2021. Copy of Memorandum Order, IFP and Notice and Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge Form mailed to Petitioner as directed. (jpow, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Lee Alden Mooney. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Letter, #3 Envelope)(jpow, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mooney v. Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Lee Alden Mooney | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Harold Clarke | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Joseph Huffstutter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
