Yarish v. Trans Union LLC et al
Richard Yarish |
Trans Union LLC, Experian Information Solutions Inc. and Specialized Loan Servicing LLC |
3:2021cv00670 |
October 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Robert E Payne |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER - Having considered DEFENDANT TRANS UNION LLC'S CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER AND OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (ECF No. 12), and there being no objection by the plaintiff, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion (ECF No. #12 ) is granted with modification. It is further ORDERED that the defendant, Trans Union, LLC, shall file its Answer and any other motions with respect to the Complaint by December 22, 2021. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 11/29/2021. (jpow, ) |
Filing 16 ORDER - CAME NOW Defendant, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ("Experian"), by counsel, upon its Consent Motion for an Extension of Time to file responsive pleadings to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff, Richard Yarish. UPON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, for good cause shown and by agreement of counsel for plaintiff, Richard Yarish and Experian, it is hereby, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Experian's Consent Motion for an Extension of Time be, and hereby is, GRANTED #14 , and it is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Defendant, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., shall be GRANTED an extension of time until on or before December 24, 2021 to file its responsive pleadings, including its Answer, to the Complaint filed by Richard Yarish. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 11/29/2021. (jpow, ) |
Filing 15 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Experian Information Solutions Inc.. (Anthony, David) |
Filing 14 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Experian Information Solutions Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Proposed Order))(Anthony, David) |
Filing 13 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Trans Union LLC. (Wright, Gibson) |
Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Trans Union LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wright, Gibson) |
Filing 11 ORDER - Having considered the CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (ECF No. 9) filed by the defendant, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, and there being no objection by the plaintiff, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion (ECF No. #9 ) is granted with modification. It is further ORDERED that the defendant, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, shall file its Answer and any other motions with respect to the Complaint by December 29, 2021. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 11/17/2021. (jpow, ) |
Filing 10 Waiver of re #9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (waiver of hearing and oral argument) by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC (Nader, John) |
Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nader, John) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Yarish Specialized Loan Servicing LLC served on 11/8/2021, answer due 11/29/2021 (Bennett, Leonard) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Yarish Experian Information Solutions Inc. served on 11/3/2021, answer due 11/24/2021 (Bennett, Leonard) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Yarish Trans Union LLC served on 11/3/2021, answer due 11/24/2021 (Bennett, Leonard) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions Inc., Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, and Trans Union LLC. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (jpow, ) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint as to Trans Union LLC by Richard Yarish. (Bennett, Leonard) (Main Document 4 replaced on 10/22/2021) (jpow, ). |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint as to Specialized Loan Servicing LLC by Richard Yarish. (Bennett, Leonard) (Main Document 3 replaced on 10/22/2021) (jpow, ). |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint as to Experian Information Solutions Inc. by Richard Yarish. (Bennett, Leonard) (Main Document 2 replaced on 10/22/2021) (jpow, ). |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8062862.), filed by Richard Yarish. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bennett, Leonard) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/22/2021) (jpow, ). (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/22/2021) (jpow, ). |
Case Assigned to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (jpow, ) |
Notice of Correction: Filing attorney is notified document numbers #2 , #3 and #4 were incorrectly saved PDF fillable form. All PDF's must be saved in nonfillable form. To correctly save the PDF fillable form, click on the File menu, select Print and then select your PDF writer from the Printer Name List, then click on Print or OK depending on your program. Clerk has made the correction. No further action is required. (jpow, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.