Willoughby v. Baugh
| Mike M. Willoughby |
| D. S. Baugh |
| 3:2022cv00177 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| David J Novak |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER (Granting Motion, Dismissing Without Prejudice) the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration and AMENDS the dismissal of this case to DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This case is now CLOSED. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 5/25/2022. A copy of this Order sent to Plaintiff as directed. (asho, )
|
| Filing 6 Letter Request for Reconsideration. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) Clerk sent Plaintiff file copy of Letter Request to verify receipt. (asho, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration by Mike M. Willoughby. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope) Clerk sent Plaintiff filed copy of Motion to verify receipt. (asho, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Mike M. Willoughby (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Clerk updated address in CM/ECF(asho, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Dismissing Case) This matter comes before the Court on its own initiative. In the Court's Order dated April 4, 2022 (ECF No. #2 ), the undersigned advised Plaintiff that failure to file a Ghostwriting Form accompanied by a statement that he has not received assistance in preparing any filing in this case no later than April 25, 2022, would result in dismissal of his case for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (b). Plaintiff has not filed the required form or attested that he made his filings without assistance. Indeed, Plaintiffs failure to contact the Court indicates to the undersigned that he has abandoned his claim. Accordingly, the Court hereby DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiffs Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (b ). Furthermore, the Court certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. l 9 l 5(a)(3). Should Plaintiff wish to appeal this Order, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal within the stated period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. This case is now CLOSED. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 4/28/2022. A copy of this Order sent to Plaintiff as directed. (asho, )
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER (Requiring Plaintiff to Correct IFP Application) that Plaintiff to file with the Court the Ghostwriting Form accompanied by a statement that he has not received assistance in preparing any filing in this case. The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to enclose a copy of the Ghostwriting Form with this Order when it is forwarded to Plaintiff. Plaintiff is ADVISED that, if he does not satisfy these requirements, including submission of the Ghostwriting Form with every filing, the provisional grant of relief to proceed in forma pauperis will be withdrawn and the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauper is will be denied. Indeed, the failure to strictly comply with the Court's directives and with applicable rules will result in DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (b ). Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 4/4/2022. Copy of Order mailed to Plaintiff at his address of record, with a copy of the Ghostwriting Form enclosed.(adun, )
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mike M. Willoughby. (Attachments: #1 Complaint (RECEIVED))(asho, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Willoughby v. Baugh | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mike M. Willoughby | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: D. S. Baugh | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
