Pearson v. TD Ameritrade
Plaintiff: Adam K. Pearson
Defendant: TD Ameritrade
Case Number: 3:2022cv00514
Filed: July 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: John A Gibney
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2022 Filing 10 *Dismissed per Order #9 * AMENDED COMPLAINT against TD Ameritrade, filed by Adam K. Pearson.(adun, )
August 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FINAL ORDER that the Court GRANTS his amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis and DENIES AS MOOT his initial motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court GRANTS Pearson's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, (ECF No. #7 ), and accepts his second amended complaint as the operative complaint in this matter. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to docket Pearson's second amended complaint. (ECF No. #7 -1.) The Court, however, DISMISSES Pearson's second amended complaint. the Court DISMISSES Pearson's second amended complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE and DIRECTS the Clerk to close this case. Furthermore, based on the frivolous nature or Pearson's claims, the Court certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). Thus, the Court hereby REVOKES Pearson's in forma pauperis status for the purpose of appeal. Should Pearson wish to appeal this Order, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of Court within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order. failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 8/8/2022. Pro Se Plaintiff mailed a copy of Order. (adun, )
August 1, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Amend Ad Damnum Amount of Damages by Adam K. Pearson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint, #2 Cover Letter)(adun, ) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/2/2022) (adun, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/2/2022: #3 83.1) (adun, ).
July 27, 2022 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against TD Ameritrade, filed by Adam K. Pearson. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Local Rule 83.1)(adun, )
July 27, 2022 Filing 5 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adam K. Pearson. (adun, )
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Pro Se E-Noticing. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 7/26/22. (adun, )
July 26, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by Adam K. Pearson. (adun, )
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER that the Court DIRECTS Pearson to file a revised "Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs" on or before Monday, August 15, 2022. In the revised application, Pearson should clarify his average monthly income in section 1 and his gross monthly pay in section 2. The Court FINDS that the complaint does not plead sufficient facts for the Court to discern whether the complaint states a claim against the defendant. The Court DIRECTS Pearson to file an amended complaint on or before Monday, August 15, 2022. Pearson's amended complaint SHALL comply with the requirements herein. Once filed, the amended complaint will become the operative complaint in this case. Failure to comply strictly with the requirements set forth above will result in dismissal of the case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS.. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 7/26/22. Order sent electronically to Plaintiff. (adun, )
July 25, 2022 Filing 8 Letter from Adam K. Pearson. (adun, )
July 22, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Adam K. Pearson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Service Address, #3 Local Rule 83.1 (M) Certification, #4 Motion for Electronic Notification). (sbea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pearson v. TD Ameritrade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam K. Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TD Ameritrade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?