White v. Golden Corral of Hampton LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit Virginia Eastern District White v. Golden Corral of Hampton LLC

White v. Golden Corral of Hampton LLC

Plaintiff:	Glorilene White
Defendant:	Golden Corral of Hampton LLC
Case Number:	4:2013cv00027
Filed:	February 25, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Newport News Office
County:	Accomack
Presiding Judge:	Douglas E. Miller
Presiding Judge:	Raymond A. Jackson
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 14, 2014	Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 25 Amended Motion for Summary Judgment. The Defendant's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. Plaintiff has not opposed summary judgment of the retaliation claim or demonstrated any genuine issue of material fact in dispute; thus, as a matter of law, Defendant's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment on the retaliation claim is GRANTED. The defendant has not demonstrated that there is no genuine issue of material fact regarding Plaintiffs disability claim and accordingly, the Defendant's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment on this disability claim is DENIED. Copies distributed as directed to counsel of record. (See footnote for specifics) Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 3/13/2014 and filed on 3/14/14. (bgra, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 14, 2014

Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 25 Amended Motion for Summary Judgment. The Defendant's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. Plaintiff has not opposed summary judgment of the retaliation claim or demonstrated any genuine issue of material fact in dispute; thus, as a matter of law, Defendant's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment on the retaliation claim is GRANTED. The defendant has not demonstrated that there is no genuine issue of material fact regarding Plaintiffs disability claim and accordingly, the Defendant's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment on this disability claim is DENIED. Copies distributed as directed to counsel of record. (See footnote for specifics) Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 3/13/2014 and filed on 3/14/14. (bgra, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Golden Corral of Hampton LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glorilene White
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Golden Corral of Hampton LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?