Fuller et al v. Aliff et al
||David Krivonak and Benjamin Fuller
||Michael Scott Wingfield, Wayne Miller, Kenneth Lamberti, Hunter Aliff, Michael Caleb Ingroff, John Does 1 & 2 and Jane Does 1 & 2
||April 30, 2013
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
||Newport News Office
||Out of State
||Tommy E. Miller
||Raymond A. Jackson
|Nature of Suit:
||Assault Libel & Slander
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 4, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Defendant Wingfield's Motion to Dismiss Count 3 is GRANTED. Defendant Wingfield's Motion to Dismiss Count 4 is DENIED. For the reasons stated above, Defendant Wingfield's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 3/4/14. Copies distributed to all parties 3/4/14. (ldab, )
|November 20, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Denying 4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Dismiss fo r Failure to State a Claim. Defendant Lamberti's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED, and Defendants Ingroff and Miller's Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 11/20/13. Copies distributed to all parties 11/20/13. (ldab, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?