56th St. Investors, Inc. et al v. Worthington Cylinders Mississippi, LLC
| 56th St. Investors, Inc. and Wayne D. Franklin |
| Worthington Cylinders Mississippi, LLC |
| 4:2013cv00149 |
| November 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Newport News Office |
| Hampton City |
| Mark S. Davis |
| Douglas E. Miller |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER entered and filed 3/7/16: This matter is before the Court to resolve claims arising from the alleged breach of an asset purchase agreement. Following a two day bench trial, the parties supplemented the proposed finding s of facts and conclusions of law submitted to the Court before trial and the matter is now ripe for adjudication. Pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Courts findings of facts and conclusions of law are set forth in t his Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Court concludes plaintiffs have failed to establish a breach of contract and/or failed to establish damages resulting from any such breach. Accordingly, JUDGMENT IS AWARDED FOR DEFENDANT, as outlined. Furthermore, defendant's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 55, is DISMISSED AS MOOT. (See Memorandum Opinion and Order for Specifics) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask on 3/7/16). Copies provided as directed 3/7/16.(ecav, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
