Pearson v. City of Hampton
Plaintiff: Albert Pearson
Defendant: City of Hampton
Case Number: 4:2015cv00135
Filed: December 11, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Newport News Office
County: Hampton City
Presiding Judge: Raymond A. Jackson
Presiding Judge: Lawrence R. Leonard
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 17 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. The Court GIVES Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint within fifteen (15) days of the filing of this Order. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/16/16 and filed on 12/19/16. (tbro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pearson v. City of Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Albert Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?