Rosado v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Reinaldo Cherbony Rosado
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 4:2016cv00173
Filed: November 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Newport News Office
County: Newport News City
Presiding Judge: Raymond A. Jackson
Presiding Judge: Lawrence R. Leonard
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER that Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, the Commissioner's decision be VACATED and REMANDED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 2/8/18. (afar)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosado v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reinaldo Cherbony Rosado
Represented By: Robert Wayne Gillikin, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?