Mobilization Funding, LLC v. W.M. Jordan Company, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit Virginia Eastern District Mobilization Funding, LLC v. W.M. Jordan Company, Inc.

Mobilization Funding, LLC v. W.M. Jordan Company, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Mobilization Funding, LLC
Defendant:	W.M. Jordan Company, Inc.
Case Number:	4:2018cv00072
Filed:	June 11, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Newport News Office
County:	Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Douglas E. Miller
Presiding Judge:	Raymond A. Jackson
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 29, 2018	Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, and Nonjoinder. The Motion is granted in that Counts I, II, and III are dismissed under Rul e 12(b)(6). The Motion is denied in that the action is not barred by Rule 12(b)(1). The Motion is further denied in that Counts IV and V are not barred under Rule 12(b)(6). The Motion is also denied in that the case is not barred by Rule 12(b)(7). The Court further ORDERS that Mexarg be joined as a defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(a) (2). The Court further ALLOWS Mobilization to amend its Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) to the extent that it must do so to adequately plead any and all claims against Mexarg within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/28/18 and filed on 11/29/18. (tbro)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 29, 2018

Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, and Nonjoinder. The Motion is granted in that Counts I, II, and III are dismissed under Rul e 12(b)(6). The Motion is denied in that the action is not barred by Rule 12(b)(1). The Motion is further denied in that Counts IV and V are not barred under Rule 12(b)(6). The Motion is also denied in that the case is not barred by Rule 12(b)(7). The Court further ORDERS that Mexarg be joined as a defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(a) (2). The Court further ALLOWS Mobilization to amend its Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) to the extent that it must do so to adequately plead any and all claims against Mexarg within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/28/18 and filed on 11/29/18. (tbro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mobilization Funding, LLC v. W.M. Jordan Company, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mobilization Funding, LLC
Represented By:	Thomas Saunders Berkley
Represented By:	William A. Lascara
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: W.M. Jordan Company, Inc.
Represented By:	Kenneth Francis Hardt
Represented By:	Mark Charles Nanavati
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?