Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P. v. Yellow Poplar Lumber Company, Inc., et al. et al
1:2013cv00062 |
July 31, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Abingdon Office |
James P. Jones |
Pamela Meade Sargent |
Bankruptcy Withdrawl |
11 U.S.C. ยง 101 Bankruptcy |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 552 OPINION AND ORDER granting 536 Motion for Attorney Fees ; granting 551 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 6/28/2017. (lml) |
Filing 462 OPINION AND ORDER granting 449 Motion to Dismiss Crossclaim; Dismissing without prejudice 384 CROSSCLAIM. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 1/3/2017. (lml) |
Filing 446 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER denying 330 the Range/EQT Motion for Summary Judgment; the Plum Creek/Highland Motion for Summary Judgment 341 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, being granted as to Range/EQTs claim solely based upon ownership of th e coal estate and otherwise denied; the Baker/Trivett/McGlothlin Motion for Summary Judgment 338 and the Motion for Summary Judgment by the Unknown Descendants, etc., of G. W. Charles, et al. 339 are DENIED. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 11/30/2016. (lml) |
Filing 431 OPINION AND ORDER on Motion to Exclude granting in part and denying in part 332 ; on Motion to Exclude granting in part and denying in part 336 . Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 11/21/2016. (lml) |
Filing 428 OPINION AND ORDER denying 330 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 338 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 339 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 341 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 11/10/16. (flc) |
Filing 397 OPINION and ORDER adding John M. Lamie, Trustee for Yellow Poplar Lumber Company as a party defendant; the trustee must file responsive pleadings within 14 days from the date of entry of this order; and directing the clerk to schedule a hearing on all pending motions. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 8/24/15. (flc) |
Filing 152 OPINION AND ORDER denying Motion to Remand (ECF 6-4, page 698); Denying Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P.s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 6-2, page 398); denying Motion to Dismiss the Crossclaim of Range Resources-Pine Mountain, Inc. (ECF 6-5, page 809); Denyin g Motion to Dismiss the Crossclaim of Range Resources-Pine Mountain, Inc. (ECF 6-5, page 843); Denying Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim of Defendants Edwin F. Legard, Jr., Anne Cox, Trustee and William G. Baker, Jr. T rustee and Memorandum in Support (ECF 6-6, page 932); Denying Defendants Matthew Trivett and Michael Trivett's Motion to Dismiss the Crossclaim of Range Resources-Pine Mountain, Inc. (ECF No. 6-6, page 967): Denying Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P.s Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim ofDefendants Donald A. McGlothlin, Jr., Mary L. Burton, Leah A. McGlothlin and Kevin T. McGlothlin and Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 6-6, page 1038); Denying Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P.s Motion to Dismiss Counterclai m of Defendants Matthew Trivett and Michael Trivett and Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 5); Denying Defendant Charles S. Bartletts Motion to Dismiss the Crossclaim of Range Resources-Pine Mountain, Inc. (ECF No. 76). Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 3/31/2014. (lml) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P. v. Yellow Poplar Lumber Company, Inc., et al. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.