Elswick v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
Connie Elswick |
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
1:2020cv00028 |
June 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Pamela Meade Sargent |
Michael F Urbanski |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER that all substantive, procedural and jurisdictional pleading and motion deadlines in this matter are STAYED for an additional 60-day period, or until October 27, 2020. If this case is not settled and removed from the docket before October 27, 2020, counsel shall tender a joint proposed scheduling order to the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 8/20/20. (ejs) |
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER granting #14 Motion withdrawing claim for injunctive relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 8/19/20. (PMS) |
Filing 14 First MOTION for Leave to Withdraw Claim for Injunctive Relief by Connie Elswick. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (Scott, Thomas) |
Filing 13 First Brief/Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss/Demurrer. filed by Connie Elswick. (Scott, Thomas) |
Filing 12 First Brief / Memorandum in Support re #11 First MOTION to Remand . filed by Connie Elswick. (Scott, Thomas) |
Filing 11 First MOTION to Remand by Connie Elswick. (Scott, Thomas) |
Filing 10 Order Setting Settlement Conference; Settlement Conference set for 8/18/2020 at 9:00 AM via Zoom Video Conference in Roanoke before Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 7/22/20. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(flc) Modified on 7/22/2020 to correct presiding judge(flc). |
Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou: Telephone Conference held on 7/22/2020. (cd) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Stay Case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 07/21/2020. (rb) |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Stay Deadlines for All Substantive, Procedural, and Jurisdictional Pleadings by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (Pritts, Matthew) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion To Dismiss due by 7/31/2020 Replies due by 8/7/2020. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 8/7/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 7/13/20. (PMS) |
Filing 5 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou for Mediation. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/8/20. (mka) |
Filing 4 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Connie Elswick. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Scott, Thomas) |
Filing 3 Order Requesting Transmittal of Case File from Buchanan County Circuit Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 6/25/20020. (flc) (Main Document 3 replaced on 6/25/2020) (flc). |
Filing 2 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Norfolk Southern Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Norfolk Southern Corporation for Norfolk Southern Corporation (flc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Buchanan County Circuit Court, case number CL19000571-00. (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400; Receipt #: 0423-3421850), filed by Norfolk Southern Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(flc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.