Emrick v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
Plaintiff: Betty Emrick
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Case Number: 1:2020cv00032
Filed: June 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Pamela Meade Sargent
Referring Judge: Michael F Urbanski
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2020 Filing 19 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou: Settlement Conference held on 8/18/2020. (cd)
August 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 REPORT of Settlement Conference. As a result of the mediation proceedings held on August 18, 2020, I hereby REPORT that the parties settled this matter upon mutually agreeable terms. The parties are to execute any necessary settlement documents and submit an agreed dismissal order to the presiding District Judge within 30 days. Entered by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on August 19, 2020. (cd)
August 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER granting #16 Motion withdrawing claim for injunctive relief Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 8/19/20. (PMS)
August 18, 2020 Filing 16 First MOTION for Leave to Withdraw Claim for Injunctive Relief by Betty Emrick. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (Scott, Thomas)
July 29, 2020 Filing 15 First Brief / Memorandum in Support re #14 First MOTION to Remand . filed by Betty Emrick. (Scott, Thomas)
July 29, 2020 Filing 14 First MOTION to Remand by Betty Emrick. (Scott, Thomas)
July 29, 2020 Filing 13 First Brief / Memorandum in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss , #6 Brief / Memorandum in Support . filed by Betty Emrick. (Scott, Thomas)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order Setting Settlement Conference; Settlement Conference set for 8/18/2020 at 9:00 a.m. via Zoom Video Conference in Roanoke before Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou.Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 7/22/20. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(flc)
July 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Stay Case all substantive, procedural and jurisdictional pleading and motion deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 7/15/20. (ejs)
July 13, 2020 Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Stay Deadlines for All Substantive, Procedural, and Jurisdictional Pleadings by Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (Pritts, Matthew)
July 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Plaintiff's Responses due by 7/31/2020 Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 7/13/20. (ejs)
July 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou for Mediation. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/2/20. (mka)
July 2, 2020 Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Betty Emrick. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Scott, Thomas)
July 2, 2020 Filing 6 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Pritts, Matthew)
July 2, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Pritts, Matthew)
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Requesting Transmittal of Case File from Buchanan County Circuit Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 6/26/20. (ejs)
June 25, 2020 Filing 3 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Norfolk Southern Corporation (ejs)
June 25, 2020 Filing 2 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Norfolk Southern Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Norfolk Southern Corporation for Norfolk Southern Corporation. (ejs)
June 25, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Buchanan County Circuit Court, case number CL20000543-00. (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400.00; receipt no 0423-3421936), filed by Norfolk Southern Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ejs) (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/26/2020) (ejs). Modified on 6/26/2020 - replaced pdf with document reflecting case number (ejs).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emrick v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty Emrick
Represented By: Thomas Ralph Scott, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation
Represented By: Matthew Patrick Warren Pritts
Represented By: Charles Jesse Dickenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Represented By: Matthew Patrick Warren Pritts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?