Moorish Science Temple of America v. United States et al
| Moorish Science Temple of America |
| United States and Dept. of Justice Bureau of Prisons |
| 2:2019cv00029 |
| July 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| James P Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1350 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re #4 Notice of Appeal filed by Moorish Science Temple of America. USCA Case Number 19-7186. Case Manager: Jennifer Rice, telephone number 804/916-2702. (ar) |
| Filing 5 Transmittal of Notice of Appeal to 4CCA re #4 Notice of Appeal (lml) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Judgment, #2 Opinion by Moorish Science Temple of America. Filing fee $ 505. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lml) |
| Assembled Electronic Record Transmitted to 4CCA re #4 Notice of Appeal (lml) |
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT dismissing as frivolous pursuant to 28 USC 1915A(b)(1). Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 8/6/19. (ejs) |
| Filing 2 OPINION. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 8/6/19. (ejs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Moorish Science Temple of America. (Attachments: #1 Ex 1, #2 Ex 2, #3 Ex 3, #4 Ex 4, #5 Ex 5, #6 Envelope, #7 Envelope)(ejs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
