Christmas v. The Arc of the Piedmont, Inc.
Plaintiff: Regina Christmas
Defendant: The Arc of the Piedmont, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2012cv00008
Filed: February 17, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Office: Charlottesville Office
Presiding Judge: Glen E. Conrad
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 2/27/13. (jcj)
July 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 7/16/12. (hnw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christmas v. The Arc of the Piedmont, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Arc of the Piedmont, Inc.
Represented By: Jeremy D. Capps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Regina Christmas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?