Selective Way Insurance Company v. Apple et al
Case Number: 3:2013cv00042
Filed: October 3, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Office: Charlottesville Office
Presiding Judge: Norman K. Moon
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 140 ORDER regarding Bill of Costs 133 filed by Selective Way Insurance Company, SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRRULED IN PART as to Objections 137 filed by Progressive Gulf Insurance Company, Brief 135 filed by Earl Eugene Hoar, Objections 136 filed by Roseanne Browning Apple, Building Industries, Inc. and Objections 134 filed by Earl Eugene Hoar. The bill of costs is reduced by $1,324.50 and Plaintiff is awarded costs in the amount of $3,118.70 against all defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d).. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 1/11/2017. (mab)
September 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 114 ORDER denying as moot 73 Motion in Limine; granting 111 Motion for Joinder. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 9/8/2015. (mab)
December 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 77 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 12/1/14. (jcj)
March 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 3/27/14. (jcj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Selective Way Insurance Company v. Apple et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?