Selective Way Insurance Company v. Apple et al
| 3:2013cv00042 |
| October 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Charlottesville Office |
| Norman K. Moon |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
140
ORDER regarding Bill of Costs 133 filed by Selective Way Insurance Company, SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRRULED IN PART as to Objections 137 filed by Progressive Gulf Insurance Company, Brief 135 filed by Earl Eugene Hoar, Objections 136 filed by Roseanne Browning Apple, Building Industries, Inc. and Objections 134 filed by Earl Eugene Hoar. The bill of costs is reduced by $1,324.50 and Plaintiff is awarded costs in the amount of $3,118.70 against all defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d).. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 1/11/2017. (mab)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER denying as moot 73 Motion in Limine; granting 111 Motion for Joinder. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 9/8/2015. (mab)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 12/1/14. (jcj)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 3/27/14. (jcj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Selective Way Insurance Company v. Apple et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
