Public Citizen, Inc., Twitter, Inc. Et Al
Twitter, Inc. |
Public Citizen, Inc. |
3:2020mc00003 |
February 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Charlottesville Office |
Glen E Conrad |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 Notice of Cancellation of Motions Hearing 3/9/2020 (No Interpreter requested) (Cancel Court Reporter) (ssm) |
Filing 22 Order transferring case to Eastern District of Virginia. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 2/25/2020. (hnw) |
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 2/25/2020. (hnw) |
Filing 20 MOTION for Sanctions by Jesselyn A. Radack. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11)(Thomas, Diana) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion #1 MOTION to Quash, #14 MOTION to Quash and Objections to Subpoena : (CR) (No Interpreter requested) Motions Hearing set for 3/9/2020 02:30 PM in Roanoke before Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad. (ssm) |
Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT re #16 MOTION to File Amicus Curia Brief Supporting Twitter's Motion to Quash by Matthew E. Kelley. by Public Citizen, Inc. (Kelley, Matthew) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Paul Alan Levy to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0423-3337335. by Public Citizen, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kelley, Matthew) |
Filing 16 MOTION to File Amicus Curia Brief Supporting Twitter's Motion to Quash by Matthew E. Kelley. by Public Citizen, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Amicus Curiae Supporting Twitter's Motion to Quash, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kelley, Matthew) |
Filing 15 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #14 MOTION to Quash and Objections to Subpoena . filed by Jesselyn A. Radack. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Thomas, Diana) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Quash and Objections to Subpoena by Jesselyn A. Radack. (Thomas, Diana) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Diana Margeaux Thomas on behalf of Jesselyn A. Radack (Thomas, Diana) |
Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #1 MOTION to Quash . filed by Twitter, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Carome, Patrick) |
Filing 11 Supplemental RESPONSE in Opposition re #1 MOTION to Quash (Statement of Additional Evidence). filed by Trevor Fitzgibbon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Settlement Agreement)(Biss, Steven) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Attorney Ari Holtzblatt for Twitter, Inc. added Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 2/12/2020. (hnw) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Attorney Patrick J. Carome for Twitter, Inc. added Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 2/12/2020. (hnw) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Ari Holtzblatt to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0423-3328381. by Twitter, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Miller, Mary) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Patrick J. Carome to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0423-3328369. by Twitter, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Miller, Mary) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #1 MOTION to Quash . filed by Trevor Fitzgibbon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Radack Discovery Responses, #2 Exhibit B - Meet and Confer Email, #3 Exhibit C - Marshall Letter Opinion)(Biss, Steven) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven Scott Biss on behalf of Trevor Fitzgibbon (Biss, Steven) |
Filing 4 Additional Evidence re #2 Brief / Memorandum in Support,, by Twitter, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Amended Exhibit A, #2 Amended Exhibit E, #3 Amended Exhibit F)(jcj) |
Filing 3 Negative Corporate Disclosure Statement by Twitter, Inc. (jcj) |
Filing 2 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #1 MOTION to Quash. filed by Twitter, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhihbit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S part 1, #20 Exhibit S part 2, #21 Exhibit E)(jcj) Modified on 2/5/2020 to seal Exhibits A, E and F due to personal identifiers (jcj). |
Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena by Twitter, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(jcj) |
Filing Fee Received $ 47.00, receipt number 300003571 (jcj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Public Citizen, Inc., Twitter, Inc. Et Al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
In re: Twitter, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Ari Holtzblatt |
Represented By: | Charles Kalman Seyfarth |
Represented By: | Patrick J. Carome |
Represented By: | Mary Grace Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Amicus curiae: Public Citizen, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Matthew E. Kelley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.