Rutledge v. Town of Chatham, Virginia et al
| Merle T. Rutledge, Jr |
| Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, Chatham, Va Police Department, Chief Marvin Wright of the Chatham, Va Police Department, City of Danville, Va, City of Danville, Va Police Department, Governor of Virginia Bob McDonnell, Officer Roach of the Chatham, Va Police Department, Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors, State of Virginia, The Honorable Governor of Arizona Jan Brewer, Town of Chatham, Virginia and Virginia Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II |
| 4:2010cv00035 |
| August 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Danville Office |
| Jackson L. Kiser |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER granting 33 Motion to Dismiss; denying 52 Motion to Amend. Case dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 11/18/10. (ham)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER dismissing claims as to all Defendants except Officer Roach; finding as moot 35 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 37 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 9 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; finding as moot 11 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 15 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 20 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 33 Motion to Dismiss as to all Defendants except Officer Roach. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 9/30/10. (ham)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
