Venable v. Mathena et al
7:2014cv00295 |
June 9, 2014 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Roanoke Office |
Robert S. Ballou |
Norman K. Moon |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 203 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 149 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 168 Prisoner Miscellaneous Motion; granting 193 Prisoner Miscellaneous Motion; the Clerk is DIRECTED to set this matter for a seven-member jury trial in the Big Stone Gap Division. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 7/6/2016. (tvt) |
Filing 197 ORDER denying 143 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 6/15/2016. (slt) |
Filing 133 ORDER granting 41 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 80 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 100 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 112 Prisoner Miscellaneous Motion; denying 116 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 117 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 120 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 9/23/2015. (slt) |
Filing 130 ORDER denying 68 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 9/8/2015. (slt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Venable v. Mathena et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.