Meyers v. Kiser et al
| David Meyers |
| R. Ballou, Glen Conrad, C. Stanley, T. Dorton, Warden Jeffrey Kiser, J. Fannin, M. Counts, K. Counts, W. Swiney, A. Clevinger, B4 Unit Manager Duncan, Edward Gwinn, Tammy Barbetto, Paul Haymes, L. Mullins, F. Stanley, James Jones, J.D. Bentley, Marcus Elam, J. King, A. Galihar, Gail Jones, C. Dudley, Keith Dawkins, Unknown Officers and Geraldine Barker |
| 7:2018cv00485 |
| October 3, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Order Requesting the Warden at Wallens Ridge State Prison to transport the plaintiff DAVID MEYERS #1039777 to the United States District Court, Big Stone Gap Division, for an evidentiary hearing on December 27-28, 2018 beginning at 9:00 a.m.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 11/30/2018. (tvt)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Hearing: (CR) (No Interpreter requested) Evidentiary Hearing set for 12/27/2018 & 12/28/2018 09:00 AM in Big Stone Gap before Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (ejs) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER denying #5 Motion to Seal Document #5 MOTION to Seal unspecific future pleadings in these consolidated cases.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 11/29/18. (PMS)
|
|
Filing 10
Order Referring this matter and all motions to United States Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent for a report and recommendation, and hearings as she deems necessary, concerning whether Meyers is under imminent danger of serious physical harm and, thus, should be allowed to proceed with this action without prepayment of the filing fee. if the magistrate judge determines that Meyers should be allowed to proceed without prepayment of fees, she should also file her proposed findings and recommendations concerning Meyers' motions seeking preliminary injunctive relief. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/27/2018. (tvt)
|
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by David Meyers. (tvt) |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT filed by David Meyers.(tvt) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER this Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-00485 and civil action No. 7:18-cv-00502 are CONSOLIDATED and both complaints will proceed as one in this Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-00485; the Clerk shall add named defendants within this order to this civil action and will docket the complaint and motion for preliminary injunctive relief from Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-00502 into this Civil Action No. 718-cv-00485 as supplements to this action; Any future filings concerning these actions should be done in Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-00485. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/27/2018. (tvt)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by David Meyers (Wallens Ridge State Prison, PO Box 759, Big Stone Gap, VA 24219)(tvt) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Seal All Claims Filed in this Civil Action Related to Civil Action 7:16-cv-00573 by David Meyers. (tvt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by David Meyers. (tvt) |
| Filing 3 Verified Statement by Plaintiff David Meyers (tvt) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Assets by David Meyers (tvt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against All Defendants, filed by David Meyers. (Attachments: #1 Claim of Relief)(tvt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
