Meyers v. Jones et al
David Meyers |
Wallens Ridge State Prison, P. Deel, Carl Manis, Walter Swiney, Keith Dawkins, Gail Jones, T.B. Dye, Counselor Young, U/M Collins and Chief of Housing and Programs |
7:2018cv00598 |
December 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Robert S Ballou |
Michael F Urbanski |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Transmittal of Notice of Appeal to 4CCA re #18 Notice of Appeal NOTE: The Docketing Statement and Transcript Order Form are available on the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals website at www.ca4.uscourts.gov. If CJA24 form(s) are applicable, you must submit a separate Auth-24 for each court reporter from whom you wish to order a transcript through the District Court's eVoucher system. (ck) |
Assembled Electronic Record Transmitted to 4CCA re #18 Notice of Appeal (ck) |
Filing 16 ORDER denying #9 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying #13 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying #14 Motion to Amend/Correct; Meyers shall have fourteen days to file an amended complaint(Response due 2/11/2019). Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 1/24/2019. (tvt) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Seal Case by David Meyers.Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (ck) |
Filing 18 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal by David Meyers. (ck) (Main Document 18 replaced on 2/1/2019) (ck). Modified on 2/1/2019 to replace main document and NEF regenerated (ck). |
Filing 15 MOTION to Seal Case by David Meyers.Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (aab) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Amend Claim 11 by David Meyers.Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(ck) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Amend Claim #10 and MOTION for Recusal by David Meyers.Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (ck) |
Filing 12 Response to #10 Order to Respond; Prisoner Trust Account Report by David Meyers (ck) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing and MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by David Meyers.Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit #25)(ck) |
Filing 10 Order to Respond with monthly trust account statements (June, August, September, and October, 2018) re #6 Order Prisoner Condfil, Responses due by 1/4/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 12/12/2018. (slt) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by David Meyers.Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (slt) |
Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) by David Meyers (slt) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Seal Case by David Meyers.Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (slt) |
Filing 6 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 12/27/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 12/4/2018. (slt) |
Filing 5 Verified Statement by Plaintiff David Meyers (ck) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) by David Meyers (ck) |
Filing 3 Statement of Assets by David Meyers (ck) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Meyers. (ck) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against All Defendants filed by David Meyers.(ck) ( Attachment #1 Proposed Summons) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.