Cody v. Chapter 13 Trustee
| City of Roanoke, Virginia |
| Chapter 13 Trustee |
| Linda Rene Cody |
| 7:2019cv00433 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Appellee's BRIEF by David L Collins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Collins, David) |
| Filing 6 Appellee's BRIEF by Chapter 13 Trustee. (Shorter, Jason) |
Filing 5
ORDER denying #3 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 07/17/2019. (aab)
|
| Filing 4 Appellant's BRIEF by Linda Rene Cody. Appellee Brief due by 8/12/2019. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibits, #3 Driver License)(aab) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Reconsideration by Linda Rene Cody. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibits)(aab) |
| Filing 2 Bankruptcy Briefing Notice: Appellant Brief due by 7/11/2019. Appellee Brief due by 8/12/2019. Appellant Reply Brief due by 8/26/2019. (aab) |
| Filing 1 Bankruptcy Notice of Appeal from Bankruptcy Court filed 06/11/2019; Bankruptcy Court case number 19-70043 (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal, #2 Order Being Appealed, #3 USBC Docket Sheet)(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
