Nielsen v. Clarke
Petitioner: Kalen Joseph Nielsen
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Case Number: 7:2019cv00657
Filed: September 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert S Ballou
Referring Judge: Michael F Urbanski
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2019 Filing 13 Paper State Court Records received from Nelson County Circuit Court, CR14-113 & 114, consisting of 2 volumes. (Paper records available for viewing in the Clerk's Office.) (sas)
November 15, 2019 Filing 12 Roseboro Notice re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Deadline set for 12/9/2019. (slt)
November 14, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE by Harold W. Clarke Pertinent State Court Records (Bourne, Rosemary)
November 14, 2019 Filing 10 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss and Rule 5 Answer. filed by Harold W. Clarke. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Bourne, Rosemary)
November 14, 2019 Filing 9 Rule 5 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Harold W. Clarke.(Bourne, Rosemary)
November 14, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by Harold W. Clarke. (Bourne, Rosemary)
November 7, 2019 Filing 7 Paper State Court Records (Certified True Copies) received from Supreme Court of Virginia, 161488, consisting of 1 Volume, (Paper records available for viewing in the Clerk's Office.) (sas)
October 16, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Rosemary Virginia Bourne on behalf of Harold W. Clarke (Bourne, Rosemary)
October 16, 2019 Filing 5 Acknowledgment of Receipt as to #4 Order of Prisoner Service (2254), filed by Harold W. Clarke.(Bourne, Rosemary)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order of Service pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. 2254 upon respondents re #3 Amended Document filed by Kalen Joseph Nielsen, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kalen Joseph Nielsen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 10/16/2019. (slt)
October 1, 2019 Filing 3 AMENDED PETITION by Kalen Joseph Nielsen. Amendment to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Amended Petition (Jones, Bryan)
September 30, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Certificate of Service by Bryan Jeffrey Jones on behalf of Kalen Joseph Nielsen (Jones, Bryan)
September 27, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254 (Filing fee $ 5.00, receipt# 0423-3236813 ), filed by Kalen Joseph Nielsen. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(aab)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nielsen v. Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kalen Joseph Nielsen
Represented By: Bryan Jeffrey Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Represented By: Rosemary Virginia Bourne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?