Neal v. Warden, USP Lee
| Denard Darnell Neal |
| United States Penitentiary Lee and Warden, USP Lee |
| 7:2019cv00699 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Glen E Conrad |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
FINAL ORDER granting #4 Motion to Voluntary Dismiss. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 12/2/2019. (slt)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Voluntary Dismiss by Denard Darnell Neal. (ck) |
|
Filing 3
Order of Service pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. 2241 upon respondents re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Denard Darnell Neal. The parties are advised that petitioner's contentions in the petition alleging retaliation and other prison conditions claims will not be addressed in this habeas corpus action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 11/13/2019. (tvt)
|
| Filing Fee Received $ 5, receipt number 7-61935 (ck) |
|
Filing 2
Order for Plaintiff to Respond with filing fee or Consent to Fee form within 21 days. Responses due by 11/14/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 10/21/2019. (slt)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Denard Darnell Neal. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(tvt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
