Halter v. Hutcheson et al
| Daniel Norbert Halter |
| Captain Jimmy Wimer and Bryan F. Hutcheson |
| 7:2020cv00229 |
| April 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Robert S Ballou |
| Jackson L Kiser |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 4/21/2020. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
|
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account;Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days Responses due by 5/14/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 4/21/2020. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Daniel Norbert Halter. Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (slt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Bryan F. Hutcheson, Jimmy Wimer, filed by Daniel Norbert Halter.(slt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
