Ceraphin v. Odom et al
Solomon Ceraphin |
Donnie Odom and Randy Myrick |
7:2020cv00716 |
November 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Robert S Ballou |
Thomas T Cullen |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable: re #4 Memorandum Opinion, #5 Order Dismissing Case regarding Solomon Ceraphin; (No forwarding address given) (sas) |
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT Prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 1/7/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 1/7/2021. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt) |
Filing 3 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days Responses due by 12/28/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 12/1/2020. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt) |
Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) and statement of Assets by Solomon Ceraphin (aab) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Randy Myrick, Donnie Odom, filed by Solomon Ceraphin.(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.