Russell v. Moore
| Jerry Dale Russell |
| James Lee Moore |
| 7:2022cv00248 |
| May 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Robert S Ballou |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Rule 26(f) Agreed Written Plan by Defendant James Lee Moore (Goad, Joshua) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Harold David Gibson on behalf of Jerry Dale Russell (Gibson, Harold) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER:( Jury Trial set for 4/18/2023 09:30 AM in Roanoke before Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski. Counsel must contact the Clerk's Office no later than five (5) business days before the scheduled trial date for your technology needs.), All non-dispositive pretrial motions and issues, except motions in limine, are hereby referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 5/31/22. (mka) Modified docket text to reflect non-dispositive motions referred on 6/1/2022 (sln).
|
| Filing 8 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski: Scheduling Conference held on 5/31/2022. (mka) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Hearing: (N) (No Interpreter requested) (#Click on this link for guidance for participation via Zoom and #Click on this link for instructions on how to listen to public hearings) Scheduling Conference set for 5/31/2022 10:00 AM in via Zoom before Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski. (mka) |
| Filing 6 Scheduling Letter (mka) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal)- located at Docket Entry #4 State Court Record at page# 13 by James Lee Moore. (ams) |
| Filing 4 Original State Court Record(s) received from Circuit Court for the County of Carroll, case number(s) CL220000075-00 consisting of 1 volume. (ams) |
|
Filing 3
Order Requesting Transmittal of Case File from Carroll County Circuit Court. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 05/09/2022. (sln)
|
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. #Click here to access the Consent Form (sln) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Carroll County Circuit Court, case number CL22000075-00. (Filing & Administrative fee $ 402, receipt # AVAWDC-3945925), filed by James Lee Moore. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint)(sln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Russell v. Moore | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jerry Dale Russell | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Joseph Tolbert |
| Represented By: | Harold David Gibson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: James Lee Moore | |
| Represented By: | Joshua David Goad |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
