Lynch v. Adams et al
| Paul David DaQuan Lynch and Paul David Lynch |
| Lt. Flemings, Unit Manager Cauhthorn, Ms. Church, Major T. Hall, W. Howard and P. Adams |
| 7:2024cv00535 |
| August 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| James P Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT Prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 9/25/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 4
OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 9/25/2024. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; within 30 days. Responses due by 9/17/2024. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 8/15/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 2
Prisoner Trust Account Report and Statement of Assets by Paul David DaQuan Lynch (tvt)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against P. Adams, Unit Manager Cauhthorn, Ms. Church, Lt. Flemings, Major T. Hall, W. Howard, filed by Paul David DaQuan Lynch.(tvt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
