Anderson v. Yakima City of
Plaintiff: Ryan Anderson
Defendant: Yakima City of
Case Number: 1:2015cv03191
Filed: November 4, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Yakima Office
County: Yakima
Presiding Judge: Lonny R. Suko
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2617
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT AN AWARD OF COSTS OR FEES granting 27 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Senior Judge Lonny R. Suko. (AY, Case Administrator)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Yakima City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yakima City of
Represented By: Jeremy Christopher Lieb
Represented By: Mark David Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ryan Anderson
Represented By: Matthew Z Crotty
Represented By: Jonathan Neill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?