Hume v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Elizabeth Hume |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2018cv03154 |
| August 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Yakima Office |
| Yakima |
| John T Rodgers |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather L Griffith on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Attorney Heather L Griffith added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Griffith, Heather) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Michael Durkin on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Attorney Timothy Michael Durkin added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Durkin, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elizabeth Hume re Commissioner of Social Security. (Tree, D) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Summons Joseph Harrington, #2 Summons US Attorney General)(PL, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Receipt # IFP). Filed by Elizabeth Hume.(PL, Case Administrator) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff seeks to file in forma pauperis a Complaint. Because it appears Plaintiff lacks sufficient funds to prosecute this action, the District Court Executive shall file the Complaint without payment of the filing fee. Summons may issue in the captioned matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. TEXT ONLY entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the court order or notice on the matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (EW, Law Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
CONSENT BY ALL PARTIES TO TRIAL AND ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Case assigned to Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers for all further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LR, Case Administrator)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Initial Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge and Consent or Non-Consent Form. Please Note: Consent Forms are not to be electronically filed with the Court. Return of Consent or Non-Consent is due by the Case Management Deadline set for 8/24/2018. (PL, Case Administrator) |
| Notice of Judge Reassignment. Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson assigned to case. (PL, Case Administrator) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers assigned to case. (PL, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hume v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elizabeth Hume | |
| Represented By: | D James Tree |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Michael Durkin |
| Represented By: | Heather L Griffith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
