Layne v. Saul
| Sarah Ann Layne |
| Andrew M Saul |
| 1:2019cv03191 |
| August 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| John T Rodgers |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob Peter Phillips on behalf of Andrew M Saul (Attorney Jacob Peter Phillips added to party Andrew M Saul(pty:dft))(Phillips, Jacob) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Michael Durkin on behalf of Andrew M Saul (Attorney Timothy Michael Durkin added to party Andrew M Saul(pty:dft))(Durkin, Timothy) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sarah Ann Layne re Andrew M Saul. (Tree, D) |
Filing 7
CONSENT BY ALL PARTIES TO TRIAL AND ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff is granted in forma pauperis status. IT IS SO ORDERED. TEXT ONLY entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the court order or notice on the matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (EW, Law Clerk)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued to General Counsel, Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Summons U.S. Attorney, #2 Summons U.S. Attorney General) as to Andrew M Saul.(AY, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Initial Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge and Consent or Non-Consent Form. Please Note: Consent Forms are not to be electronically filed with the Court. Return of Consent or Non-Consent is due by 08/26/2019. Case Management Deadline set for 8/26/2019. (AY, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M Saul IFP Pending Filed by Sarah Ann Layne. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Tree, D) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/15/2019) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/15/2019) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/15/2019) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 3 replaced on 8/15/2019) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 4 replaced on 8/15/2019) (AY, Case Administrator). Modified on 8/15/2019 - documents replaced and NEF regenerated, initial filing had incorrect name of Plaintiff within the documents. (AY, Case Administrator). |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers assigned to case. (AY, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Layne v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sarah Ann Layne | |
| Represented By: | D James Tree |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
| Represented By: | Jacob Peter Phillips |
| Represented By: | Timothy Michael Durkin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
