Anderson v. Kettle Falls International Railway
Plaintiff: Brian S Anderson
Defendant: Kettle Falls International Railway
Case Number: 2:2011cv00347
Filed: September 22, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Spokane Office
County: Stevens
Presiding Judge: Rosanna Malouf Peterson
Nature of Suit: Federal Employers Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 71 JUDGMENT IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiffs Complaint and any and all counterclaims and/or cross-claims are dismissed with prejudice and without costs toany party. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Kettle Falls International Railway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian S Anderson
Represented By: Patrick Mark Risken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kettle Falls International Railway
Represented By: Gregory C Hesler
Represented By: William John Schroeder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?