Krigbaum v. Transworld Systems Inc
Plaintiff: William Krigbaum
Defendant: Transworld Systems Inc
Case Number: 2:2017cv00430
Filed: December 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Spokane Office
County: Outside of District
Presiding Judge: Thomas O. Rice
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and the Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to either party. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BF, Paralegal)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Krigbaum v. Transworld Systems Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Krigbaum
Represented By: Joshua Randall Trigsted
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Transworld Systems Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?