Tuttle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Timothy Tuttle
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2019cv00030
Filed: January 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Presiding Judge: John T Rodgers
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Lars Joseph Nelson on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Attorney Lars Joseph Nelson added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Nelson, Lars)
February 22, 2019 Payment for Civil Case ( Filing fee $ 400; Receipt # 0980-3099790).. (Hatfield, Chad)
February 6, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Michael Durkin on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Attorney Timothy Michael Durkin added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Durkin, Timothy)
January 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT BY ALL PARTIES TO TRIAL AND ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (JW, ECF Admin)
January 24, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Timothy Tuttle re Commissioner of Social Security. (Hatfield, Chad)
January 22, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Reissued as to Attorney General. (LR, Case Administrator)
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Before the Court is Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the affidavit of indigency, however, reveals a lack of information regarding how Plaintiff covers his expenses. Within (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall proffer the full filing fee, or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Case Management Deadline set for 2/21/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (LR, Case Administrator)
January 18, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney, #2 Summons Issued as to Attorney General)(LR, Case Administrator)
January 18, 2019 Filing 3 Notice of Initial Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge and Consent or Non-Consent Form. Please Note: Consent Forms are not to be electronically filed with the Court. Return of Consent or Non-Consent is due by the Case Management Deadline set for 1/28/2019. (LR, Case Administrator)
January 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Fee Waived Filed by Timothy Tuttle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Hatfield, Chad)
January 18, 2019 Notice of Judge Assignment. Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers assigned to case. (LR, Case Administrator)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tuttle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Timothy Michael Durkin
Represented By: Lars Joseph Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Tuttle
Represented By: Chad L Hatfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?