Tuttle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Timothy Tuttle |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2019cv00030 |
January 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
John T Rodgers |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Lars Joseph Nelson on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Attorney Lars Joseph Nelson added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Nelson, Lars) |
Payment for Civil Case ( Filing fee $ 400; Receipt # 0980-3099790).. (Hatfield, Chad) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Michael Durkin on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Attorney Timothy Michael Durkin added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Durkin, Timothy) |
Filing 8 CONSENT BY ALL PARTIES TO TRIAL AND ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (JW, ECF Admin) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Timothy Tuttle re Commissioner of Social Security. (Hatfield, Chad) |
Filing 6 Summons Reissued as to Attorney General. (LR, Case Administrator) |
Filing 5 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Before the Court is Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the affidavit of indigency, however, reveals a lack of information regarding how Plaintiff covers his expenses. Within (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall proffer the full filing fee, or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Case Management Deadline set for 2/21/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (LR, Case Administrator) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney, #2 Summons Issued as to Attorney General)(LR, Case Administrator) |
Filing 3 Notice of Initial Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge and Consent or Non-Consent Form. Please Note: Consent Forms are not to be electronically filed with the Court. Return of Consent or Non-Consent is due by the Case Management Deadline set for 1/28/2019. (LR, Case Administrator) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Fee Waived Filed by Timothy Tuttle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Hatfield, Chad) |
Notice of Judge Assignment. Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers assigned to case. (LR, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tuttle v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Timothy Michael Durkin |
Represented By: | Lars Joseph Nelson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Timothy Tuttle | |
Represented By: | Chad L Hatfield |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.