Anthony v. Saul
| Robert B Anthony |
| Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M Saul |
| 2:2019cv00274 |
| August 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Thomas O Rice |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Diana Andsager on behalf of Andrew M Saul (Attorney Diana Andsager added to party Andrew M Saul(pty:dft))(Andsager, Diana) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Rudolf J Verschoor on behalf of Andrew M Saul (Attorney Rudolf J Verschoor added to party Andrew M Saul(pty:dft))(Verschoor, Rudolf) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE as to #3 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint filed by Robert B Anthony. (Marken, Evan) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff is granted in forma pauperis status. IT IS SO ORDERED. TEXT ONLY entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the court order or notice on the matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (EW, Law Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Andrew M Saul. (PL, Case Administrator) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice assigned to case. (PL, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M Saul (IFP Pending) Filed by Robert B Anthony. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(PL, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
