Ray v. Saul
Nicole Ray |
Andrew M Saul |
2:2020cv00003 |
January 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Fred Van Sickle |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey R McClain on behalf of Andrew M Saul (Attorney Jeffrey R McClain added to party Andrew M Saul(pty:dft))(McClain, Jeffrey) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Michael Durkin on behalf of Andrew M Saul (Attorney Timothy Michael Durkin added to party Andrew M Saul(pty:dft))(Durkin, Timothy) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicole Ray re Andrew M Saul. (Tree, D) |
Filing 7 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff is granted in forma pauperis status. IT IS SO ORDERED. TEXT ONLY entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the court order or notice on the matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (EW, Law Clerk) |
Filing 5 AMENDED ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH LEAVE TO RENEW. Before the Court is Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the affidavit of indigency, however, reveals Plaintiff failed to state how she is covering the gap between her expenses and her income. Within (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall proffer the full filing fee, or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Case Management Deadline set for 2/3/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary K. Dimke. (TR, Case Administrator) |
Filing 4 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH LEAVE TO RENEW. Before the Court is Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the affidavit of indigency, however, reveals the plaintiff failed to state how she is covering the gap between expenses and income. Within (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall proffer the full filing fee, or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Case Management Deadline set for 2/3/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary K. Dimke. (VR, Courtroom Deputy) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Andrew M Saul. (Attachments: #1 Summons - General Counsel, #2 Summons - US Attorney General)(VR, Courtroom Deputy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M Saul IFP Pending Filed by Nicole Ray. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Tree, D) |
Notice of Judge Assignment. Senior Judge Fred Van Sickle assigned to case. (VR, Courtroom Deputy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ray v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nicole Ray | |
Represented By: | D James Tree |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey R McClain |
Represented By: | Timothy Michael Durkin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.