Goodin v. Bahder et al
Elliott D Goodin |
Dr Dodds Simagen and Dr Gregory Bahder |
2:2020cv00017 |
January 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Thomas O Rice |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH LEAVE TO RENEW. Before the Court is Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the affidavit of indigency, however, reveals lack of information. Within (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall proffer the full filing fee, or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Case Management Deadline set for 2/12/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (VR, Courtroom Deputy) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Gregory Bahder, Dodds Simagen. (VR, Courtroom Deputy) (Main Document 4 replaced on 1/13/2020 with issued signature and date.) (VR, Courtroom Deputy). |
Filing 3 Letter from Elliott D. Doodin to Honorable Judge Thomas O. Rice Received January 13, 2020. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Envelope) (VR, Courtroom Deputy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gregory Bahder, Dodds Simagen (Filing Fee $400, Receipt # IFP Pending) Filed by Elliott D Goodin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(VR, Courtroom Deputy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.