Roll v. Saul
Plaintiff: Alan Roll
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Case Number: 2:2020cv00382
Filed: October 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Presiding Judge: John T Rodgers
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alan Roll re Andrew M Saul. (Osterhout, Karl)
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Michael Durkin on behalf of Andrew M Saul (Attorney Timothy Michael Durkin added to party Andrew M Saul(pty:dft))(Durkin, Timothy)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT BY ALL PARTIES TO TRIAL AND ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Granting #6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Directing Payment of Fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (MO, Courtroom Deputy) Modified on 10/28/2020 Filing Fee paid on 10/19/2020. See receipt number at ECF No. #6 (LMR, Case Administrator).
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Karl Osterhout. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number 0980-3592027. by Alan Roll. Motion Hearing set for 11/18/2020 Without Oral Argument before Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (Dellert, Christopher)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued to Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Summons U.S. Attorney, #2 Summons U.S. Attorney General) as to Andrew M Saul.(AY, Case Administrator)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Initial Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge and Consent or Non-Consent Form. Please Note: Consent Forms are not to be electronically filed with the Court. Return of Consent or Non-Consent is due by 10/29/2020. Case Management Deadline set for 10/29/2020. (AY, Case Administrator)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff is granted in forma pauperis status. IT IS SO ORDERED. TEXT ONLY entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the court order or notice on the matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary K. Dimke. (EW, Law Clerk)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M Saul IFP Pending Filed by Alan Roll. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons U.S. Attorney's Office, #3 Summons U.S. Attorney General, #4 Summons SSA, Office of the General Counsel)(Dellert, Christopher)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Notice of Judge Assignment. Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers assigned to case. (AY, Case Administrator)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roll v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alan Roll
Represented By: Christopher H Dellert
Represented By: Karl E Osterhout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Represented By: Timothy Michael Durkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?