Tamarack Aerospace Group Inc v. Meta Special Aerospace LLC
| Tamarack Aerospace Group Inc |
| Meta Special Aerospace LLC |
| 2:2021cv00126 |
| March 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Stanley A Bastian |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Rule 26 / Rule 16 Attorney Report , by Meta Special Aerospace LLC and by Tamarack Aerospace Group Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Protective Order, #2 Agreement Re Discovery of Electronically Stored Information and Proposed Order)(Hatch, Caleb) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Russel C. Lissuzzo. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-3797311. by Meta Special Aerospace LLC. Motion Hearing set for 6/23/2021 Without Oral Argument before Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Defendant's Motion to Admit Attorney Russell C. Lissuzzo, III Pro Hac Vice, #2 Proposed Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Admit Attorney Russell C. Lissuzzo, III Pro Hac Vice)(Stocker, Steven) |
| Filing 8 Rule 26 / Rule 16 Attorney Report Defendant's Initial Disclosure by Meta Special Aerospace LLC. (Stocker, Steven) |
| Filing 7 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Meta Special Aerospace LLC. (Stocker, Steven) |
| Filing 6 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE NOTICE : Scheduling Conference set for 6/1/2021 at 10:00 AM by Video Conference before Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (MF, Courtroom Deputy) |
| Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by Meta Special Aerospace LLC.(Attorney Steven Robert Stocker added to party Meta Special Aerospace LLC(pty:dft))(Stocker, Steven) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tamarack Aerospace Group Inc re Meta Special Aerospace LLC. (Hatch, Caleb) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Meta Special Aerospace LLC. (CLP, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tamarack Aerospace Group Inc. (Wilcox, Bryce) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Meta Special Aerospace LLC ( Filing fee $ 402; Receipt # AWAEDC-3756913) Jury Demand. Filed by Tamarack Aerospace Group Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Wilcox, Bryce) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian assigned to case. (CLP, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tamarack Aerospace Group Inc v. Meta Special Aerospace LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Meta Special Aerospace LLC | |
| Represented By: | Steven Robert Stocker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tamarack Aerospace Group Inc | |
| Represented By: | Caleb Andrew Hatch |
| Represented By: | Bryce James Wilcox |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
