Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Harry Johnson Plumbing & Excavating Co Inc
| Cincinnati Insurance Company |
| Harry Johnson Plumbing & Excavating Co Inc |
| Harry Johnson Plumbing & Excavating Co Inc |
| Cincinnati Insurance Company |
| 4:2016cv05090 |
| July 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Richland Office |
| Walla Walla |
| Lonny R. Suko |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
JUDGMENT in favor of Harry Johnson Plumbing & Excavating Co Inc against Cincinnati Insurance Company. (LR, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER DENYING HJPE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, denying 99 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Lonny R. Suko. (LR, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER GRANTING CIC'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, granting 61 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; finding as moot re 79 Motion to Strike ; and granting 88 Motion to Strike. Signed by Senior Judge Lonny R. Suko. (LR, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER, granting 30 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Senior Judge Lonny R. Suko. (LR, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, denying 9 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Lonny R. Suko. (LR, Case Administrator)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
