Monk v. United States of America
| Edward Alan Monk |
| United States of America |
| 4:2021cv05085 |
| June 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Thomas O Rice |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION. (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) (LLH, Courtroom Deputy) |
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT. Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and would lack any arguable basis in law or fact. Plaintiff's Motion to Obtain Electronic Case Filing Authorization, ECF No. #5 , is DENIED as moot. The file is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH LEAVE TO RENEW. Before the Court is Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the affidavit of indigency, however, reveals Plaintiff has failed to answer to the last two questions on the form. Within (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall proffer the full filing fee, or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Case Management Deadline set for 7/8/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (CIC, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Obtain Electronic Case Filing Authorization by Edward Alan Monk. Motion Hearing set for 7/7/2021 Without Oral Argument before Judge Thomas O. Rice. (TR, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United States of America. (TR, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE RE: Unsigned Filing. Pursuant to Rule 11, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, you must sign each document you present to the Court. Please sign and return the attached copy of the signature page of the FTCA Complaint. This is a text notice only. (TR, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 FTCA COMPLAINT (Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 1346(b)) against United States of America. (Complaint is not properly signed.) (Filing Fee $402, Receipt # IFP Pending) Jury Demand. Filed by Edward Alan Monk. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(TR, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Monk v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edward Alan Monk | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
