Wizards of the Coast Inc v. Rutter et al Featured Case

Plaintiff: Wizards of the Coast Inc
Defendant: John 1-10 Does
Case Number: 2:2006cv00095
Filed: January 19, 2006
Court: Washington Western District Court
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: Ricardo S Martinez
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 19, 2006 1
COMPLAINT FOR MISAPPROPRIATION OF TRADE SECRETS, COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT, BREACH OF CONTRACT, AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT against defendants Daron Rutter and John Does 1-10. (Summons(es) issued) (Receipt # 320745), filed by Wizards of the Coast Inc. (Attachments: (1) Civil Cover Sheet)(MKB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wizards of the Coast Inc v. Rutter et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wizards of the Coast Inc
Represented By: Gregory F Wesner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John 1-10 Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.