Madison House Ltd et al v. Sothebys International Realty Affiliates Inc et al
2:2006cv01054 |
July 25, 2006 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
Marsha J. Pechman |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER to: (1) VACATE STATE COURT ORDER OF DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND (2) STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT. RE:12 MOTION to Vacate State Court Order of Default and Default Judgment filed by Sothebys International Realty Affiliates Inc; 9 MOTION to Remand Action to State Court under 28 U.S.C. 1447(c) filed by Madison House Ltd, Albert Hughes, Kathryn Hughes, 17 Stipulation, filed by Madison House Ltd, Albert Hughes, Kathryn Hughes, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD, ) Modified on 9/25/2006 (MD, (Certified copy mailed to KC Superior Court) ). |
Filing 2 ORDER re 1 Notice of Removal, filed by Cendant Corporation,, Sothebys International Realty Affiliates Inc,, Cendant Real Estate Services Group Inc,; removing parties have 7 days from date of order to respond; signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SC, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Madison House Ltd et al v. Sothebys International Realty Affiliates Inc et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.