Madison House Ltd et al v. Sothebys International Realty Affiliates Inc et al
Case Number: 2:2006cv01054
Filed: July 25, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
Presiding Judge: Marsha J. Pechman
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER to: (1) VACATE STATE COURT ORDER OF DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND (2) STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT. RE:12 MOTION to Vacate State Court Order of Default and Default Judgment filed by Sothebys International Realty Affiliates Inc; 9 MOTION to Remand Action to State Court under 28 U.S.C. 1447(c) filed by Madison House Ltd, Albert Hughes, Kathryn Hughes, 17 Stipulation, filed by Madison House Ltd, Albert Hughes, Kathryn Hughes, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD, ) Modified on 9/25/2006 (MD, (Certified copy mailed to KC Superior Court) ).
August 1, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER re 1 Notice of Removal, filed by Cendant Corporation,, Sothebys International Realty Affiliates Inc,, Cendant Real Estate Services Group Inc,; removing parties have 7 days from date of order to respond; signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SC, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Madison House Ltd et al v. Sothebys International Realty Affiliates Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?