O&R Construction, LLC v. Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corporation et al
Plaintiff: |
O&R Construction, LLC |
Defendant: |
Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corporation, Dun & Bradstreet Corporation and Dun & Bradstreet Inc |
Case Number: |
2:2012cv02184 |
Filed: |
December 13, 2012 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Office: |
Seattle Office |
County: |
Island |
Presiding Judge: |
Thomas S. Zilly |
Nature of Suit: |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
December 21, 2017 |
Filing
263
MINUTE ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND RELATED DATES; Length of Trial: 10-14 days; Jury Trial is set for 3/4/2019 before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Dispositive motions due by 8/30/2018, Amended Pleadings due by 6/7/2018, Motions in Limine due by 1 /17/2019, Pretrial Order due by 2/15/2019, Pretrial Conference set for 2/22/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Trial briefs to be submitted by 2/15/2019, Proposed voir dire/jury instructions due by 2/15/2019. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
November 8, 2017 |
Filing
258
MINUTE ORDER denying parties' 257 Second Joint Motion for a Status Conference. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
October 13, 2017 |
Filing
256
ORDER denying without prejudice deferred portion of plaintiffs' 238 Third Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement, signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
October 12, 2017 |
Filing
255
MINUTE ORDER per 254 Stipulation, the Court grants leave for Michael D. McKay, well as his former and current firms, to withdraw as counsel of record for DBCC. The Court further treats this stipulation as a notice of appearance by Charles C Huber on behalf of DBCC. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (PM)
|
July 21, 2017 |
Filing
249
MINUTE ORDER re parties' 248 Stipulation : Deadline for parties to file a supplemental brief, revised proposed forms of notices to class members, a revised stipulation of settlement, and any proposed opt-out form is further EXTENDED to 8/25/2017 ; RENOTING deferred potion of plaintiffs' 238 Third Unopposed MOTION for Preliminary Approval of Second Amended Class Action Settlement : Noting Date 8/25/2017. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
June 23, 2017 |
Filing
246
MINUTE ORDER re parties' 245 Stipulation ; Deadline for the parties to file a supplemental brief, revised proposed forms of notices to class members, a revised stipulation of settlement, and any proposed opt-out form is further EXTENDED to July 21, 2017 ; RENOTING deferred portion of plaintiff's 238 Third Unopposed MOTION for Preliminary Approval of Second Amended Class Action Settlement : Noting Date 7/21/2017. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
June 1, 2017 |
Filing
244
MINUTE ORDER extending deadline to file supplemental brief, revised proposed forms of notices to class members, a revised stipulation of settlement, and any proposed opt-out form to 6/23/2017, re parties' 243 Stipulation ; RENOTING deferred portion of plaintiff's 238 Third Unopposed MOTION for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement: Noting Date 6/23/2017. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
May 5, 2017 |
Filing
241
ORDER to Consolidate; granting in part, deferring in part 238 Unopposed MOTION for Preliminary Approval of Second Amended Class Action Settlement and Memorandum in Support Therof filed by O&R Construction, LLC, by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT) Modified docket text on 5/5/2017 (SWT).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?