Yates v. Sinclair
| Robert Lee Yates |
| Stephen D. Sinclair |
| 2:2013cv00842 |
| May 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Pierce |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
MINUTE ORDER directing parties to file a Joint Status Report by 10/26/2018. Authorized by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER STAYING CASE. Following the conclusion of Petitioner's state court proceedings, Petitioner shall, within thirty (30) days, bring a motion to lift the stay. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE directing all parties to SHOW CAUSE no later thantwenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order why this Court should not stay the habeas petition for six months while the Washington legislature considers the bill re abolition of death penalty. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 99 Motion for Reliance on Evidence ; No later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order the parties shall submit a proposed briefing schedule, by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER granting Agreed 79 Motion for service by US Marshals of subpoenas for evidentiary hearing by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)cc USMO w/285 forms/subpoenas/Order
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER granting in part and denying in part petitioner's 40 Motion for evidentiary hearing; the In-Court Deputy will contact parties to schedule a hearing by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez denying 49 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Robert Lee Yates.(SSM)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER by Judge Ricardo S Martinez granting in part and denying in part Petitioner's 39 Motion for Discovery and to Expand the Record as to Claims 4,9 and 14 in his habeas petition. The State SHALL supplement the record with the proportionality review records by a date to be determined at the parties' upcoming Status Conference on August 9, 2016. (PM)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting petitioner's 18 Motion for stay and abeyance by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting stay of execution until 9/10/13; atty general shall immediately notify respondent Stephen Sinclair of stay by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (RS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Yates v. Sinclair | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Stephen D. Sinclair | |
| Represented By: | Paul Douglas Weisser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Robert Lee Yates | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Erwin Ellis |
| Represented By: | Todd Maybrown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
