Brady v. AutoZone Stores, Inc. et al
Michael Brady |
AutoZone Stores, Inc. and AutoZoners LLC |
2:2013cv01862 |
October 15, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
Snohomish |
Richard A Jones |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 ORDER re parties' submissions on impact of Washington Supreme Court Advisory Opinion; instructing parties to meet and confer regarding a schedule for trying plaintiff's individual claims; joint statement due no later than two weeks from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (SWT) |
Filing 77 ORDER The Court previously certified two questions to the Washington Supreme Court. Dkt. # 73 . The Clerk of Court is directed to submit to the Supreme Court of Washington certified copies of that Order Dkt. # 73 , the underlying supporting doc uments (Dkt. ## 68-73), and a copy of the docket in the above-captioned matter. The record so compiled contains all matters in the pending cause deemed material for consideration of the state law questions certified for answer by Judge Richard A Jones. (RS) clerk to mail all documentation by UPS to Supreme Court on 3/9/17 |
Filing 62 ORDER Denying Motion to Certify Class by Judge Richard A Jones.(VE) |
Filing 17 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. (CL) |
Filing 15 ORDER re: Model Agreement of Electronically Stored Information by Judge Richard A Jones. (CL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.