Die-Mension Corporation v. Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Die-Mension Corporation
Defendant: Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corporation, Dun & Bradstreet Corporation and Dun & Bradstreet Inc
Case Number: 2:2014cv00855
Filed: June 9, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: XX US, Outside District
Presiding Judge: Thomas S. Zilly
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 157 ORDER to Consolidate, by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Case Nos. C12-2184, C14-855, C14-1021, C14-1288, and C14-1404 are CONSOLIDATED into Case No. C12-2184. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE Case Nos. C14-855, C14-1021, C14-1288, and C14-1404. All future filings shall bear the cause number C12-2184 TSZ (SWT)
September 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ORDER granting DBCC's 93 Motion to Dismiss; Counts I and II of the Second Amended Complaint, docket no. 91, are DISMISSED, without prejudice, and with leave to file a motion to amend; any such motion shall include a redlined version of a proposed third amended complaint and shall be filed within thirty-five (35) days of the date of this Order by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (PM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Die-Mension Corporation v. Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Die-Mension Corporation
Represented By: Christopher Collins
Represented By: Stuart A. Davidson
Represented By: Frank J Janecek, Jr.
Represented By: Jack Landskroner
Represented By: Drew Legando
Represented By: Ross E Shanberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corporation
Represented By: Denise A Dickerson
Represented By: Melissa F. Godwin
Represented By: Gail E Lees
Represented By: Timothy W Loose
Represented By: Zathrina Zasell G Perez
Represented By: Richard F Schwed
Represented By: Vania W. Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dun & Bradstreet Corporation
Represented By: Michael H. Diamant
Represented By: Patrick J. Krebs
Represented By: Gail E Lees
Represented By: Timothy W Loose
Represented By: Zathrina Zasell G Perez
Represented By: Richard F Schwed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dun & Bradstreet Inc
Represented By: Michael H. Diamant
Represented By: Patrick J. Krebs
Represented By: Gail E Lees
Represented By: Timothy W Loose
Represented By: Zathrina Zasell G Perez
Represented By: Richard F Schwed
Represented By: Vania W. Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?